kurtj29
·I just recently discovered the Zenith El Primero watches and just purchased a Striking 10th. I absolutely love the design of these watches - the tri-color subdials, the fit and finish of these watches is incredible. One of the reasons I purchased the Striking 10th was that supposed overlapping dial "design flaw" was mitigated (Link Here for a detailed explanation).
I really love the look of the 38mm 1969 watch but the "flawed" design of the minutes subdial stopped me. Then I read a review of the 38mm on Hodinkee (Link) and one of the comments made the following assertion: Sub-dials are perfect in design. In fact, here's what you do: Save the steel bracelet photo as your desktop background. Take a clear ruler to it and see that the 30 minute and 12 hour dials markers are lined up so that the 30 minute is perfectly readable! And if the second sub-dial at 9 is a bother, then remember: when doing chronograph functions, one uses the big red hand. Yes, this watch design is perfect in every way, right down to the unobtrusive and subtle date. A classic from 1969 that looks contemporary today.
I copied a picture of the 38mm from the internet and marked it up to see if the hour hash marks could substitute for the missing/overlapped minutes hash marks and the commenter was correct. The hour hash marks match the missing minutes marks to the point that the subdial is actually not really unreadable. Does this mitigate the supposed "design flaw" of the overlapping subdials? It would be great if someone with the 38mm or even the 42mm could take some pictures of the chronograph at the 17-21 minute values. Picture below. Comments?
I really love the look of the 38mm 1969 watch but the "flawed" design of the minutes subdial stopped me. Then I read a review of the 38mm on Hodinkee (Link) and one of the comments made the following assertion: Sub-dials are perfect in design. In fact, here's what you do: Save the steel bracelet photo as your desktop background. Take a clear ruler to it and see that the 30 minute and 12 hour dials markers are lined up so that the 30 minute is perfectly readable! And if the second sub-dial at 9 is a bother, then remember: when doing chronograph functions, one uses the big red hand. Yes, this watch design is perfect in every way, right down to the unobtrusive and subtle date. A classic from 1969 that looks contemporary today.
I copied a picture of the 38mm from the internet and marked it up to see if the hour hash marks could substitute for the missing/overlapped minutes hash marks and the commenter was correct. The hour hash marks match the missing minutes marks to the point that the subdial is actually not really unreadable. Does this mitigate the supposed "design flaw" of the overlapping subdials? It would be great if someone with the 38mm or even the 42mm could take some pictures of the chronograph at the 17-21 minute values. Picture below. Comments?
Edited: