Show us your Speedmaster Moon

[lustrousaurus]

timestamp

Waitwaitwait....

Lego studs are compatible with Speedmaster pushers!?

There has to be a deeper meaning to this...

Haha yes! I was quite surprised, it was meant to be.

 

[munichblue]

timestamp

Modern version from 2015 on a 1171/633

I love this bracelet on my Speedy.

 

[nearlyretired]

lustrousaurus

Had some fun with this...

 

[nearlyretired]

lustrousaurus

Had some fun with this...

Should have set the watch to 02.56 GMT !

 

[dan99]

https://imgur.com/7LaXraO

 

[nearlyretired]

D dan99

https://imgur.com/7LaXraO

Bought exactly the same watch last week!
Enjoy!

 

[Sanremo]

New for me - ST69

 

[Seaborg]

 

[chief3630]

On a Alphashark slim Bond. I think the color of the grey stripe is more accurate to Omega than the original Alphashark.

 

[Andres AL]

Here's mine during a makeover.

 

[Al22]

Speedy Ultra

 

[Mad Dog]

Standard issue modern Speedy Gonzales Moonwatch.

Original pic...



Jacked up pic via button mashing and Apple Pencil...

 

[vbrad26]

@Mad Dog That would be a cool wall print.
Andy Warhol-esque

 

[nearlyretired]

60th Anniversary

 

[nearlyretired]

 

[ras47]

The New Era, a co-axial (Blasphemy!!) Speedmaster Moonwatch Chronograph.
311.33.44.51.01.001

 

[Duckie]

ras47

The New Era, a co-axial (Blasphemy!!) Speedmaster Moonwatch Chronograph.
311.33.44.51.01.001

Sorry, but I'm not entirely certain that a Co-axial can actually qualify as a moon watch. At least not in the context of the origins and spirit of the thread.

But I suppose the question needs to be asked if a Co-axial can indeed qualify as a "Moonwatch" now that the 3861 movement has been born in a 50th anniversary Apollo XI watch.
Perhaps only a manual wind can be in the club??

Edited: Apr 19, 2019

 

[pianomankd]

 

[ras47]

D Duckie

Sorry, but I'm not entirely certain that a Co-axial can actually qualify as a moon watch. At least not in the context of the origins and spirit of the thread.

But I suppose the question needs to be asked if a Co-axial can indeed qualify as a "Moonwatch" now that the 3861 movement has been born in a 50th anniversary Apollo XI watch.
Perhaps only a manual wind can be in the club??

I call it a "Moonwatch" only because Omega calls it that. The co-axial models are far removed from the originals, and even the current manual-wind models.

 

[pianomankd]

Are you guys really debating this?

Just enjoy the photos, that's what this thread is for.