I would have no way of knowing what Movado brought to the development of the EP. I didn't work for either company. . If you read starting with the beginning bottom paragraph on the left, it states that there was a joint venture with the ambition of producing the first automatic chronograph. This was after 1966 and before 1969. This tells me that Movado had their hand in the development but to what extent I have no idea.
I know what vonOsterhausen (and no one else) says. I'm asking for actual evidence.
Zenith bought a whole chronograph manufacture in 1960 to produce an automatic chronograph for their centennial. Movado had to ask Piguet to make their 90 and 95M and then did not innovate for 25 years. The two get together under the same holding company in 1969, and the automatic chronograph that appears in January of that year has Movado elements? OK, which ones? What did Movado bring to the table in the final month before launch that counts as a contribution?
vonOstehausen is a Movado fan-boy. Good for him, too. Much neglected brand IMO. But he makes as many errors as Roessler.
the Ur-thread: http://orologi.forumfree.it/?t=31321982
there are others by the same author detailing various aspects - enjoy the feast
I'd be interested in Nicola's opinion about this specific issue - he swings by every now and again.
@nicola1960 , esiste alcun elemento per sostenere un ruolo per Movado nello sviluppo di El Primero?